Mass Shooting Hysteria

Mass Shooting Hysteria is sweeping the nation. Everyone wants an answer to these tragedies. Hopefully a simple one. That fits our closely held political beliefs. Alas, there is no simple answer except one: Gun Control. So let’s match facts up to theory.
mass shooting hysteria
In theory, firearm background checks are a significant part of the answer. The Dayton shooter had a clean background when he bought his weapons. The El Paso shooter: same. The Garlic Festival shooter:  same. So if background checks are the answer, what now? Deeper background checks are needed some say. Would a firearm applicant need to divulge his mental history? If he admits to a mental defect history, or admits to membership in the KKK, the approving agency could make further inquiry. But if the applicant says he has no history or problematic organization memberships, then what? HIPAA laws would block any such inquiry into mental history, so you would never know.
In theory, Red Flag laws could help. Red Flag laws are designed for those instances where someone is accused of being a threat to themselves or others. Let’s assume you can build in enough due process safeguards to keep innocent persons from being drawn into a Red Flag lawsuit. It still would not have changed any of the mass shootings referenced above. None of these shooters had tipped off anyone ahead of time.
In theory, more areas should be gun free. Yeah, that has worked so well. All three locations were already gun-free zones. The Garlic Festival shooter cut his way through a fence. The bar in Dayton was gun free by statute. The gun-free Walmart was designated by the property owner and well posted. Almost every mass shooting has happened in a gun-free zone.
In theory, gun show sales should be restricted and subject to background checks. Guess what? Any Federal Firearms License holder is already subject to that law. Now you can argue that gun shows bring gun-loving people together, and as private citizens, they do not have to do a background check on a private sale. However, some states already require background checks on all gun sales. But since all three shooters legally bought their firearms, this idea would not have changed a thing.
So what the gun control crowd ultimately wants is a ban on gun ownership. It is the only way to prevent these tragedies, they opine. And since we can’t trust anyone, no more guns for hunting, otherwise only hunters can be mass shooters. I would suggest that the confiscation of all firearms would be even less effective than our war on drugs, and look how well that has gone.
Me? I recognize the horror that mass shootings have on the citizenry, but the only possible simple answer is to remove gun-free zones. Gun-Free Zones are not obeyed by people with bad intent, but good guys do follow the law. Allow good guys to carry in most prohibited places provided they have a a state issued gun carry license. It will not solve every problem but it would put more good guys with guns in places where they might can stop another mass shooting tragedy.

1 reply

  1. The two major groups with views on this issue gun owners and gun control advocates both want safety, including a stop to mass shootings. The difference is gun control advocates want someone else to be responsible for their safety and the gun owners accept that responsibility.

    Allowing everyone to carry firearms everywhere might help but to be effective it needs to be accompanied with training. The power to deliver death is a big responsibility and should not be taken lightly. The training should include an ethics segment. A three day course will not get the job done. Shooting, like playing a musical instrument takes practice to do well. Proficiency is not achieved until thousands of rounds have been fired, or thousands of notes have been played. Perhaps a carry license should require a qualification test just like law enforcement agents.

    Technology has almost advance to the point we could put a paralyzing ray in a carriable package. Until that gets here we should consider encouraging citizens to carry other non-lethal measures.

    Death as a deterrent does not always work in these cases as many mass shooters take their own lives when they finish their rampage. Early detection efforts have proven to be impossible. So stopping them quickly in the act is the only viable option at this time. Waiting for law enforcement to arrive does not offer the speed needed. So basically Kelly is right arm the good guys to give us a chance to stop this madness.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s